Judge Andrew Napolitano Is Back At FOX NEWS, And He Defends His Wiretapping Claims.

Sharing is Caring!

by Pamela Williams
Welcome back, Judge Napolitano and God bless you for sticking to your guns! I hope Fox has apologized to you! Wow, I am so happy the Judge is back, and I am excited to hear what he has to say. I am going to first list the video in which he says it.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=TdsxbzAOJJo
 
Published on Mar 29, 2017
Judge Andrew Napolitano made his first appearance on Fox News Wednesday since making the claim that President Obama surveilled Trump Tower during the 2016 election nearly two weeks ago.
At his beginning of his latest appearance, host Bill Hemmer brought up the suspension, yet Napolitano said he still stands by claim.
Sponsored Links by
“The American public needs to know more about this rather than less because a lot of the government’s surveillance authorities will expire in the fall, and there will be a great debate about how much authority we want the government to have to surveil us.”
Napolitano wrote in a column March 16, “Sources have told me that the British foreign surveillance service, the Government Communications Headquarters, known as GCHQ, most likely provided Obama with transcripts of Trump’s calls.”
Fox anchor Shepard Smith later refuted the judge’s claim
 
The Judge is quoted as saying:  
“Yes, I do and the sources stand by it,” Napolitano said when asked if he’s sticking by the story. “And the American public needs to know more about this rather than less because a lot of the government surveillance authority will expire in the fall and there will be a great debate about how much authority we want the government to have to surveil us, and the more the American public knows about this the more informed their and the Congress’ decision will be.”
He added that “a lot more is going to come” on the issue.
“He used GCHQ. What is that? It’s the initials for the British intelligence-finding agency,” Napolitano said on Fox. “So, simply by having two people saying to them president needs transcripts of conversations involving candidate Trump’s conversations, involving President-elect Trump, he’s able to get it and there’s no American fingerprints on this.”
 
OK…the Judge is speaking of how President Trump was surveilled, but he is not speaking about the “unmasking of US citizens and the wide dissemination of classified information throughout the network.” This is what is a felony and carrying a 10 year prison term with it.
As we know Chief of the House Intelligence Committee, Devin Nunes, has said he will not hold anymore meetings until both FBI Director James Comey and NSA Chief Rogers is further briefed in a House classified setting.  Thus, Nunes is waiting for Comey and Rogers to come forward.  They were to come for a hearing on March 28, but they failed to show.  
 
If you or I failed to show for a court date, just imagine what we would go through.  This is a double standard that I am really sick of.
 
I hope to see progress very soon in this case into the leaks and wiretapping of President Trump and his team.
 
 

See also  President Biden falsely claims he has ‘total authority’ over states
See also  Chinese state-run newspaper claims warships could ‘soon’ near Hawaii
1,124 views

5 thoughts on “Judge Andrew Napolitano Is Back At FOX NEWS, And He Defends His Wiretapping Claims.

  1. In addition to my having always assumed he has a so-called ‘dead man’s trigger,” since he speaks on things very publicly that you are not ‘allowed’ to speak about, and hasn’t been suicided or disappeared yet, this makes me wonder, does he have some serious dirt on Murdoch or Ailes that he is back now, and NOT backing down from his wiretap claims? This is the guy who should be only the Supreme Court. And 8 more exactly like him (maybe cloning technology can be used for good).

    • It’s either that, or they’ve reached a point where they simply don’t care what the public finds out about — at some point, they’ll have to “inform” the rest of us that we now live in a dictatorship and there’s nothing we can do about it.
      They may actually want us to know about the extent of the surveillance, because that makes us think we’re all being listened to, making it less likely that we’ll speak out against them even in private, after all we don’t want to be sent to prison or worse, be “suicided”.

      • Yea I can see that point as well. Control through fear. I do think Nap is absolutely correct though. His integrity is unmatched IMO, and the fact that their house-lib shill Shep is so damn adamant against it speaks volumes to me.

  2. this is the kind of political crime that a false flag event could easily handle. Regardless, the obozo and the hag skate.

Leave a Reply to junktex Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.