Judicial Tyranny: Supreme Court Keeps the Dreamers!

Sharing is Caring!

By Chris Black

The Supreme Court of the United States just told President Trump: you’ll have to keep the DREAMERs. The thing is, on Monday, the Supreme Court delivered a stunning ruling, which makes for a serious setback when it comes to the issue of the DREAMERs, the DACA recipients, to whom, as you know, President Trump put a deadline o March 5th: either you (the Congress) get a deal for DACA recipients, of, after that, they’re eligible for deportation, as they lose all the protections that were given to them by Barack Hussein Obama.
The Supreme Court essentially said on Monday: not so fast, Mr. President, as Trump had directly appealed a lower court ruling from a San Francisco judge, one of those judicial supremacists, a liberal activist on the court, that actually told the POTUS: you don’t have the right to end or terminate the DACA program created by Obama via an executive order.
Trump tried to appeal this to the Supremes, and he basically said: look, I don’t want to go through all the appeals court processes, as it will take forever, and DACA will just get stuck in the courts; basically, President Trump wanted a direct appeal through the Supreme Court, he went to them, and they told him: we will not take the case. Let the appeals court handle it, and, after a while, after it goes through the appeal court process, you want to appeal that down the road, who knows, maybe, maybe not, we will listen to the case.
What the Supreme Court has done is that it deferred to the lower court liberal judge, which means that because of the ruling of one activist judge in San Francisco, DACA cannot be repealed. Translated into layman’s terms, we’re now living through the beginning of a judicial tyranny. To make a long story short, you have a program that protects from deportation 700,000+ illegal aliens (who came here as minors, some of them brought by their illegal alien parents) and also gives them automatically renewable work permits every 2 years. DACA is a program created by executive order by Obama, a program that is arbitrary, illegal and clearly unconstitutional. The President cannot make immigration law, only Congress can. But even if you think DACA was legal/constitutional, it’s just an executive order, so by definition, because it wasn’t passed by the US Congress, i.e. it’s an administrative executive order, the POTUS has full power and prerogative to repeal it. You live by the sword, you die by the sword.
My question to you is this: how comes President Trump does not have the right to repeal an executive order issued by former President Obama? The judicial branch, more precisely this leftist judge in San Francisco, is now usurping the entire authority of the POTUS. More than that, what this judge is saying is: you don’t control immigration policy, President Trump, nor does Congress. I control it, and I dictate immigration laws for this country, because my personal opinion is: I like DACA , so, it’s too bad for you Mr. Trump. You cannot repeal, eliminate or abolish DACA, because I say so.
This judge is clearly out of control, exceeding his power, authority and his jurisdiction. If one unelected judge wearing a black robe can randomly dictate what the public policy or law should be, why even have a President? Why even have Congress? Why even have elections? What’s the point?
This is what is slowly destroying the country: we no longer have judges who are there to interpret the Constitution, but we have judges who are there to legislate from the bench. People who think their job is to write law. Buddy, if you want to write a law, run for office, get elected, and then you can knock yourself out. That’s not your job from the bench. And these liberal activist judges are given immunity for their actions, as they have a lifetime tenure, a lifetime appointment. And so now, the POTUS’ hands have been tied, the March 5th deadline means nothing, and DACA must stand for at least several more months if not years as this things winds through the courts. And that means whatever leverage Trump had over Congress to make a deal about DACA, it’s gone baby gone. So the legislators can now dither about DACA, kick the can down the road, wait till after the midterms (I believe that was the goal of the ruling the whole time) and maybe, the DEMs can regain the House or the Senate, and then they can pass what the San Fran judge obviously wants, a full amnesty for all of the DREAMERs. No wall, no end to legal immigration, no end to chain migration, i.e. everything that Trump was asking for in return for solving the DACA issue. What we have now done is we are now empowering judges to essentially assert their political will over us, the American people and over the voters. This is a very dangerous assault upon the pillars of our democracy and our constitutional republic. Once you start allowing individuals who claim to have authority to override the democratic process to neutralize the ability of the Congress and the President to do their job as elected representatives, we don’t have a Republic anymore. What he have is essentially a form of judicial tyranny.

READ  Maryland high court upholds Baltimore billboard tax
READ  Maryland high court upholds Baltimore billboard tax
824 views

14 thoughts on “Judicial Tyranny: Supreme Court Keeps the Dreamers!

  1. Trump made his first mistake when he allowed the first change he made to immigration regulations (the so-called first “Muslim ban”) to be overruled by judicial fiat. His position then should have been, “The laws, as written now, give the Executive branch of government the authority to regulate immigration. The Judicial branch does not have the authority to overrule or modify directives of the Executive branch. The decision has been made and will be implemented. If you don’t like it, take it to congress and change the law.”

  2. First off, the Supreme Morons, do not ,do not make laws. Whatever they say is just an OPINION. There is no need for this court and the FOOLS that sit on it ( time tp disband the spectacle court ). America has a republic system that has 3 branches of government. Executive, LEGISLATIVE and Judicial – each one plays,a certain role: The Legislative branch known as Congress, makes laws and the Executive branch enforces those laws. President Trump needs to have these filthy judges and moron sanctuary mayors and throw in jail for life for they are violating the laws of this country. ” Harboring ang giving refugee to lawbreakers ” is a FELONY.

  3. First off, the Supreme Morons, do not ,do not make laws. Whatever they say is just an OPINION. There is no need for this court and the FOOLS that sit on it ( time tp disband the spectacle court ). America has a republic system that has 3 branches of government. Executive, LEGISLATIVE and Judicial – each one plays,a certain role: The Legislative branch known as Congress, makes laws and the Executive branch enforces those laws. President Trump needs to have these filthy judges and moron sanctuary mayors and throw in jail for life for they are violating the laws of this country. ” Harboring ang giving refugee to lawbreakers ” is a FELONY.

  4. The US Supreme Court is not the One Supreme Court created by The US Constitution. The 11th Amendment removed all Judicial Power from the One Supreme Court which was an Article 3 Court. The One Supreme Court was to be staffed by Judges not Justices. The Judiciary Act created an inferior court called The US Supreme Court which is staffed by Justices not Judges.
    The United States is all the land owned by The United States of America. The Federal land in your state is called for example State of Texas not Texas or Texas state. State of Texas is the federal land inside of Texas. All 50 states are like this. The “States of———–” are called States of The United States and congress can make any rule for this land as it is federal land under the needful rules clause. The US Constitution has at least two Presidents. Article 1 sec 7 calls for a President of The United States to sign all the bills this is a legislative job as it is found in Article 1. Article 2 sec 1 calls for The Chief Executive Officer to be The President of The United States of America. The US Constitution was ratified by the States but not adopted by subscribed oath as required by This Constitution as required. The Oral oath in Article 2 is not the oath required to adopt This Constitution as required. A US citizen is a government employee and the lowest status you can have. In order to be a US citizen you need to take the citizenship oath given by someone authorized to give the oath.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.