Representative Steve Scalise Upgraded As FBI Insists Shooting “Spontaneous,” “No Motive,” And “No Target In Mind.” Loretta Lynch Called For “Blood In The Streets.”

by Pamela Williams
Thank heavens Representative Steve Scalise has gone from critical to fair condition.  The Scalise office says he “continues to make good progress.”  While we are elated with this news, some Liberals have actually been quoted as saying, “I am glad he was shot.”  Just as Loretta Lynch called for blood in the streets to fight Republicans, other Liberals are also calling for the same.
In case you did not hear Lynch, you must review this shocking video.  She is under investigation for her role in the protection of Hillary Clinton during the investigation of her emails, and I think she should also be arrested for treason.  Maybe some of these Liberals, who are threatening Trump and the Republicans listened to Lynch.  What she did is an outrage!
www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxQOCw1w82U
Published on Jun 16, 2017
Loretta Lynch Is About To Go To Prison For What She Was Caught Doing Right Before Baseball Shooting
The country is still reeling from the shocking shooting of a Republican Congressman earlier this week. The deranged lunatic named James T. Hodgkinson shot Representative Steve Scalise, was an avid Bernie Sanders supporter and a member of the “resistance” movement. As the details of this horrific crime filtered in we learned that President Trump was actually the intended target of Hodgkinson’s rage. But, that is not all that has been discovered in this heinous crime that has stunned the nation. Which could all possibly be traced back to what Loretta Lynch did right before the baseball game.
While the mainstream media, RINO’s and liberals continue to blame President Trump for the violent outbursts from the left, we are reminded of the truth. Ever since Donald Trump took office we have witnessed an increase in the left’s violent actions. These vile and disgusting human beings have openly mocked President Trump and that is not all. We have a play that is funded with taxpayer dollars of President Trump being assassinated, Kathy Griffin mocking Trump being beheaded, and actors calling for the rape of Melania Trump.Instead of our leaders calling for calm and unity, they continue to promote it with their own hateful rhetoric. Which is why what Loretta Lynch could be in deep water for what she posted not too long ago. Obama’s Attorney General, Loretta Lynch called for liberals to resist President Trump even if that meant blood and death in the streets.Lynch says in this video,“We have always had to work to move this country forward to achieve the great ideals of our Founding Fathers. They’ve marched, they’ve bled, yes some of them have died. This is hard. Every good thing is. We have done this before; we can do this again.”
Excuse me, but doesn’t that sound awfully like someone is inciting violence? Well, I took the time to look up what a domestic terrorist was and what Loretta Lynch said in this video falls right into it.
Section 802 of the USA PATRIOT Act (Pub. L. No. 107-52) A person engages in domestic terrorism if they do an act “dangerous to human life” that is a violation of the criminal laws of a state or the United States, if the act appears to be intended to: (i) intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination or kidnapping.It certainly sounds like that Lynch openly incited violence which the shooter may have heeded. You see words do matter and what we say can influence others actions. Now, don’t get me wrong Hodgkinson was a nutcase, but if he acted on Lynch’s command then she is responsible as well.
We have seen violent groups such as ANTIFA take these words and put them into action. Over the past several weeks, there has been an increase in violence against Trump supporters and I do not see that ending anytime soon. Just earlier this week, shots were fired at a truck that displayed a “Make America Great Again” flag on Tuesday in Indiana. Are people blind and fail to see a pattern being formed?
However, Lynch is not alone is not alone.
Failed Vice Presidential candidate Tim Kaine also urged violence in the streets against Trump supporters back in January. Kaine appeared on MSNBC where he told Democrats to “fight in the streets” and resist the Trump administration.
 
Now, a man on Facebook, who threatened Trump has been arrested and is being held without bail.  This is how these people should be treated.  They must be lined up and arrested, starting with Loretta Lynch.  But to top it all off, the FBI is actually protecting them.  You can look at this as an actual war against Trump and his supporters, or a war being waged by Liberals against Republicans.  However, you see it, I believe we are at war.
FBI officials are saying now that James Hodgkinson had more than 200 rounds of ammunition at a local storage unit when he attacked Republicans as they practiced baseball.  Also, he visited the office of Bernie Sanders, and emailed Senators Tammy Duckworth and Dick Durbin the FBI said.  Hodgkinson was a Far-Left Liberal, who aimed to please his fellow Democrats.  Loretta Lynch should be named as an accomplice in this crime.  After watching the above video, it seems very clear that Hodgkinson was following her orders.
This man did have a paper with a list of names on it, and Fox News has reported those names.  They are as follows:

  1. Rep. Scot DesJarlais – R-Tenn.
  2. Trent Franks – R-Ariz.
  3. Jeff Duncan – R-SC
  4. Jim Jordan – R- Ohio
  5. Mo Brooks – R-Ala.
  6. Morgan Griffith – R-Va.

Do you see any Democrats listed?  No, but yet the FBI is saying he did not have targets or motive.  This is so blatantly false, it blows my mind.  At least I am not alone in seeing this, as the Associated Press is calling the FBI statements “totally baffling.”  Further they are saying it is very clear that Hodgkinson detested Republicans with a fiery passion.
This is the official statement of the AP:
The gunman who shot a top House Republican and four other people on a Virginia baseball field didn’t have any concrete plans to inflict violence on the Republicans he loathed, FBI officials said “Wednesday…They said he acted alone and had no connections to terror groups. But they said they had not yet clarified who, if anyone, he planned to target, or why, beyond his animus toward President Donald Trump and the Republicans he felt were ruining the country…“At this point in the investigation, it appears more spontaneous,” Slater said.  Hodgkinson had a piece of paper with the names of six members of Congress written on it, Slater said, but the note lacked any further context and there was no evidence from his computer, phone or other belongings that indicated he planned to target those officials…He also took pictures of the baseball field where he would later fire more than 60 shots. “The FBI does not believe that these photographs represented surveillance of intended targets,” the FBI said in a statement.”
All I can say is God help us.
 
The following is quoted from:  townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2017/06/22/bizarre-fbi-calls-scalise-shooting-spontaneous-gunman-had-no-target-in-mind-n2344739
(1) Mr. Hodgkinson hated Republicans with unusual ferocity, as evidenced by his letters to the editor and social media footprint.  The man belonged to a Facebook group called “Terminate the Republican Party,” for goodness sake.  The night before his spree, he conducted an internet search for a 2017 GOP convention.
(2) He was in possession of photographs he had taken of the ball field where Republicans held their practices, a loose description of which had been publicly reported.  I’ve been to that park.  It is not picturesque or a tourist attraction in any way. The FBI says it has determined that the pictures were not evidence of prior surveillance.  How and why?
(3) The would-be assassin had a list of six members of Congress’ names on his person at the time of the shooting, all of whom were reportedly Republicans, though the FBI has not confirmed that detail.  The note “lacked further context,” we’re told, so we ought not leap to any conclusions about the significance of those names.  Might his subsequent action of shooting at Republican members of Congress count as relevant context?
(4) Hodgkinson arrived at the scene of the attempted massacre with two guns, including a rifle, and a large supply of ammunition.  He was able to fire more than 60 shots.  That’s a lot of fire power for a “spontaneous” event. He’d rented a storage locker, at which he kept an even bigger cache of bullets.  He was also visited by police in Illinois when neighbors complained that he was conducting target practice in the woods near his home.  Shortly thereafter, he traveled to Washington, DC.
(5) Before starting the bloodletting, Hodgkinson inquired as to the partisan affiliation of the members of Congress practicing on the field.  After confirming that they were Republicans and not Democrats, he stuck around to open fire.
The FBI says this matter is being pursued as an assault on members of Congress and federal officers. Why isn’t it being investigated as an act of terrorism?  The dictionary definition of terrorism is, “violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes.”  Hodgkinson’s acts surely appear to fit that bill — as did the 2012 plot by another left-wing extremist who was convicted on domestic terrorism charges after his plan to massacre social conservatives was thwarted by a security guard.  Are the feds at least keeping the terrorism angle open as a possibility here?  If not, why not?

806 views