So a judge thinks he can stop a President from rescinding the Executive Order of another President? DACA isn't even Constitutional. It's not law.

How does a JUDGE tell an EXECUTIVE he cant rescind another EXECUTIVE’s order?
The Supreme Court can overrule this easily. Time to start incarcerating state officials for violating federal law. 10 years prison & $500,000 fine.

 

We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!

A federal judge in New York ruled Tuesday that the government must fully restart the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals deportation amnesty and accept brand new applicants as well as renewals, throwing a potential wrench in the ongoing debate over the fate of “Dreamers” on Capitol Hill.
Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis said the administration does have the power to revoke DACA, but it must give a sound reason for doing so — and the Homeland Security Department’s September 2017 rationale fell far short of what is required in that regard.
He even used Mr. Trump’s own tweets as evidence that the DACA program was ended precipitously, pointing to President Trump’s claims that he could “revisit this issue” as proof the program could have been continued.
Judge Garaufis is the second federal judge to rule Mr. Trump’s aides bungled the phaseout — but his decision is the most wide-ranging, ordering the government to not only allow those already in the program to renew their applications but also ordering the government to accept new applications.

www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/feb/13/court-orders-full-restoration-daca-program/

Views:

3 thoughts on “So a judge thinks he can stop a President from rescinding the Executive Order of another President? DACA isn't even Constitutional. It's not law.”

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.