The State of Alabama Breaks Federal Law by Destroying Election Evidence Which is Supposed to be Held for 22 Months According to Federal Law

Sharing is Caring!


Source: www.scribd.com/document/367998949/Roy-Moore-Complaint pg. 47
I highly recommend you read James Condit’s entire affidavit as it goes into some insider knowledge of electronic voting machines, and presents that they can be controlled wirelessly.
h/t OhRutherfordBehave

See also  ‘COVID Zero’ New Zealand has completed its transformation into a full-blown Police State
See also  Biden to Eliminate Testing Opt Out, all public workers to get vax or get fired
1,234 views

2 thoughts on “The State of Alabama Breaks Federal Law by Destroying Election Evidence Which is Supposed to be Held for 22 Months According to Federal Law

  1. They don’t even try to hide the fact that they have just committed voter fraud. What other possible reason would there be to destroy the evidence of the vote count? Could it be because they just won a legitimate election but they don’t want to be able to prove it? It seems to me that if I just won an election, I would want to retain the evidence that proves that I won, not destroy it, in case someone tries to contest it, unless of course, if I had just committed fraud to win it, then I might want the evidence destroyed. That would be the only reason.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.