WEB TROUBLES: INSTAGRAM Will Start Blurring 'Offensive' Photos… FACEBOOK 'Hunt & Kill White Women' Post Not Hate Speech?

TWITTER explores subscription-based option…

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) – Twitter Inc is considering whether to build a premium version of its popular Tweetdeck interface aimed at professionals, the company said on Thursday, raising the possibility that it could collect subscription fees from some users for the first time.

Like most other social media companies, Twitter since its founding 11 years ago has focused on building a huge user base for a free service supported by advertising. Last month it reported it had 319 million users worldwide.

But unlike the much-larger Facebook Inc , Twitter has failed to attract enough in advertising revenue to turn a profit even as its popularity with U.S. President Donald Trump and other celebrities makes the network a constant centre of attention.

Subscription fees could come from a version of Tweetdeck, an existing interface that helps users navigate Twitter.

INSTAGRAM Will Start Blurring ‘Offensive’ Photos…
Instagram is the latest internet company to step up efforts to hide content from users, implementing an automatic blur feature for images it deems “offensive”.

The social network announced the incoming censorship feature on Wednesday, saying it will be rolled out imminently.

Instagram said the filter will first be used to obscure photos of shocking events of “humanitarian crises” like war and famine – and could be expanded to cover sexual material too.
FACEBOOK ‘Hunt & Kill White Women’ Post Not Hate Speech?

READ  For the sake of the kids: AGs from 44 states warn Mark Zuckerburg NOT to create a new Instagram for under 13s

The way in which Facebook polices content on its network is under scrutiny again after it was revealed that a post in which a user called for white women to be “hunted and killed” was deemed to not be a violation of community standards.

“White women should be hunted and killed then we won’t get white babies who think the(y) own the world,” the user posted.

When the post was reported by another user for “hate speech,” Facebook responded with the message, “We reviewed the comment you reported for displaying hate speech and found it doesn’t violate our Community Standards.”

Meanwhile, posts by Christians that simply state bible passages in discussions about homosexuality are being removed, while pages devoted to showing grisly mock images of President Trump being assassinated are not taken down.


And Google’s YouTube video platform was found to be raking in money from conspiracy theories saying the London outrage was a hoax.

As the maniac behind the attack was unmasked as 52-year-old Khalid Masood:

  •  The security services faced questions because he was known to police and MI5;
  •  Home Secretary Amber Rudd denied failures but admitted: ‘One got through’;
  •  It emerged MPs had raised concerns about the Commons gates Masood waltzed through;
  •  Officials revealed that he was shot dead by a ministerial bodyguard, rather than by armed police;
  •  Islamic State claimed Masood was its ‘soldier’;
  •  Officers made eight arrests around the country;
  •  The death toll rose to five when a 75-year-old man died in hospital last night.
READ  Supreme Court considers hearing a case on 'most offensive word'

GOOGLE ad boycott could aim ire at software…

San Francisco (AFP) – Google’s money-making foundation is strong enough to endure a current boycott by advertisers, but the movement could rattle the practice of software “programmed” ad placement, analysts said on Thursday.

The internet giant’s core business of serving up advertising along with online search results appeared to be safe from the boycott, motivated by companies seeking assurances that their marketing messages won’t be displayed along with hateful or outright terrorist content, particularly videos on Google-operated YouTube.

The “backlash” could broaden into a rebellion against the market practice of software programming ad placements, slowing not only Google’s revenue but also that of other internet firms, according to Jackdaw chief analyst Jan Dawson.

“I would think Google (and parent company Alphabet) would be extremely lucky to emerge from all this with minimal financial impact,” he said in a blog post.

“I think it’s far more likely it sees both a short-term dent in its revenues and profits from the spreading boycotts and possibly a longer-term impact as brands reconsider their commitments to programmatic advertising in general.”

‘Homeland’ terror training for GAWKER alumni…


31 thoughts on “WEB TROUBLES: INSTAGRAM Will Start Blurring 'Offensive' Photos… FACEBOOK 'Hunt & Kill White Women' Post Not Hate Speech?

    • 1)Oprah never said all people must die.
      2) White woman don’t give a Fuck about protecting white men. And black men don’t give a Fuck about protecting black women. Stop acting like white men are alone in that boat.
      White women and black men are ungrateful and stupid. They think they made things happen for their groups – but they didn’t do shit but ride coat tails.
      It’s not a feminist thing – it’s those 2 groups: WHITE WOMEN / BLACK MEN. Note that black men routinely make racist videos against black WOMEN on YouTube – death threats are common. YOUTUBE host Tommy Sotomayor has repeatedly made racist death thteats including saying black females should all be gassed Nazi style. He takes money to allow men of all races to make racial slurs and rape murder threats against black women. It takes MONTHS to have the threats removed – if ever.
      Good. Deal with white women and their duplicity. But leave black women (even Oprah) out of it. Black women and girls aren’t hurting you and black men wipe their asses on their women.

      • You lying sack of shit. She said ALL [old] WHITE PEOPLE MUST DIE.
        Here’s the video of Oprah saying, All “old” white people must die.
        Oh, and I know exactly how black men treat their women, it’s a rape culture. I no longer look down on young black women that are pregnant, cause she most likely is pregnant not by choice.
        Why don’t you give the non black public a window into the black culture like Marc Maron WTF unwittingly did on his podcast when he had a black female comedian tell the truth (she didn’t realize white people don’t really know) about the violence that is common day experiences in her culture. I didn’t write down the episode, but I will find that too eventually, if Maron doesn’t delete it first…
        I hope karma sneaks up on you and everything related to you and gives you exactly what you deserve as soon as possible.

        • Dude you have too many separate issues that you are putting on black women.
          1) You Sista Souljah-d Oprah. Why are you choosing to act like she said that old whites should be KILLED. She said that generation of very OLD whites and their racism…..Needs to die. Are you really going to quibble over her not adding “off” at the end? Everything she said leading up to that point indicated these folks were cultural DINASUARS…..Listen to what she said. If she was being racist, why would she want OLD whites to be KILLED or die? Wouldn’t young whites be a better target?
          2) You said you acknowledge that black women and girls suffer rape and abuse in black community. But then went on about Black females being predators of MEN…..And how they would attack YOU like animals if you weren’t so big and strong! WTF?! Where do you get that? You are more of a threat to black females. There has never, in all of U.S history, been a single year where more WHITE MALES were beaten or killed by BLACK FEMALES than black females are assualted or kill by white males! Yet, that has never been acknowledged. Thousands of assualts by white men on Black women and girls hundreds to thousands of murders! Sure, white male on Black female violence is no where near the rate of black male on whites….And everybody violence. But that does not make black females a threat to YOU.
          AMAZING how men like you say blacks are ridiculous for claiming the police are a serious threat to their lives and safety. But men like you talk about black women like black chicks are killing and beating you every day! Statistically, your claims about black women have FAR, FAR, FAR!!!! less statistical fact or even serious anecdotal evidence. BLACK FEMALES ATTACK YOU?!

          • I’d beg to differ. Just because Oprah has 4 billion dollars and can have attorneys tell her how to word a statement doesn’t make it any more legal to call for the death of ANYONE. So sorry. Conditional calls for the death of white ppl, is still a hate crime.
            The white dude trying Idk what having dreads got his ass beat by black women. I live in NYC, I protect myself from the women no less than the men.
            It is true that 8% of the population in the US cause 70% of the personal and property crime and those are black men. That was from the FBI.gov site circa 2012, before Obama obfuscated the statistics and started to mix hispanics in with white ppl. No such thing as a white hispanic. Too funny. I know, I have two half hispanic sons.
            Just so you know, white men couldn’t care less about black women, per se, not even enough to touch them let alone try to attack them. We have other things to do.
            I can’t say that’s the case for black women. For example, I was on the bus and a small group of black women were lamenting there were too many cops at some mall so they couldn’t steal anything. Seriously, not the way the ppl I grew up with or live now think.
            Don’t bs me. I’ve worked around Downstate in Brooklyn and have done more shots and stabs than I can count. I’ve lived in the Bronx for about 14 years. I know the score. You can’t bs me. I’ve been in the houses, I’ve seen the people as they are, not as they want to be seen, and I don’t believe professors or pundits trying to mislead me. I’m not a person that hasn’t seen death, I was just one of the stupid ones working in FDNY EMS, trying to help ppl.
            Guess what now: Fk everyone. In the final analysis, it mattered not. Not to my patients, who just acted like wounded animals. Not to me, because after I put my body through all of that, all I can think of now, why tf did I ever do that? I found it, it’s a personality frailty. I needed to do good, cause I was told I was bad as a child. How stupid is that!? The need to help ppl is a sign of weakness. Human nature sucks.
            Either way, you really don’t get how docile white ppl are cause you’ve not grown up in white communities. White ppl are ridiculously non-violent. It’s pathetic. I wish they had the balls to throw off this tyrannical govt, but they don’t got the balls, so they will be slaughtered just like they are being now in South Africa.

          • What are you talking about? A white guy with dread locks? You were on a bus and overheard black women talking about shoplifting?!
            THAT is your proof that black women are a THREAT TO YOU?! You are a coward who wants to justify your fear by saying black women are MAKING you scared. But FAR more black women and girls are assaulted or killed by white males, than black females do to white males-
            1) White man-Dewey Green brutally kills random black woman, Janice Pitts by repeatedly running over her with his car
            2) 51 year old Black woman Deborah Pearl ambushed and shot by Matthew Ryan Desha, a 29-year-old white man. They’d never met before
            3) White man  David Desper shoots  18 yr old black girl in the head Bianca Roberson for cutting him off in traffic.
            4) Teresa Ardion black woman- beaten with a hammer and dragged behind a truck by white man
            5) Pol Danilov (white) stabbed a random  elderly black woman because he hated blacks
            6) Kody Lott of Texas shoots black girl Makayla Smith and her white friend  Lauren Landavazo .  Her friend, Lauren, dies.
            7) Joy Risker killed by her white  husband and then hacked up .
            MANY MORE CASES!

          • I missed this comment, but there was a white dude trying to be a wigger, that couldn’t even defend himself from a black girl slapping him around. Truly pathetic display, even IF most DV reports are now females as perps.
            70% of all personal and property crime is caused by 8% of the population. That was from fbi.gov circa 2012. I started quoting that, and viola, the gov’t obfuscated it and memory holed that page. Now mexicans are listed as white, to conflate the lowest crime rate population: ding a ling white ppl. Travon Martin wasn’t murdered by a white hispanic, if you can think that, you just can’t think rationally.
            That’s 10s of thousands of crimes. Don’t list a few dumb ass whites and some how try to imply a handful of dumb ass white crimes levels the playing field of 10x of thousands of crimes.
            Give me a fk’ing break. Seriously, you believe your own bullshit?

          • You didn’t miss this point. You just keep trying to say that black women are a violent threat to you when the FACTS are you-as a white male-still assualt and kill more black women and girls than they do you!
            Stop talking about some guy with dreads. Stop putting your Men’s Rights bullshit on black women. STOP USING CRIME STATS OF BLACK MALES IN ORDER TO SAY THAT BLACK FEMALES ARE ATTACKING AND KILLING WHITE MALES….. LIKE PACKS OF WILD ANIMALS!
            “A few white dummies”? It’s not a few! White males commit more assaults
            and murders on BLACK FEMALES. So…..why are you going out of your way to count black MALE violence as if black females did it? Oh, yea…. black mothers raised them? Oprah told them to do it?
            YOU have spent more time specifically saying black females are violent predators than Black males!! You will then claim “Both black men and women are violent!” But it’s YOU white men beating and killing black females more than black females do YOU. There has NEVER been a year in American history where black females assaulted or killed more white men than reverse. And black females could, since black males manage it despite their small numbers.
            Ok…. you clearly are gearing up to physically attack black females and claim self defense! That is clear to me. You ignore obvious facts and continue to claim black women plot on buses, beat white men on trains and would circle and kill YOU if you let them! But you ignore the truth and dismiss it with “a few crazy white guys”?

          • You are absolutely wrong about the relative threat of black women to white men, vs., white men to black women.
            Black women are a product of their environment. There seems to be two general classes of black people. The “loud” blacks I forgot which state they normally hail from, my bad, and the “quiet” blacks that operate pretty much like the ding a long white people, just trying to get a job, maybe have a family, pay taxes and dutifully die younger to save the gov’t retirement funds.
            So maybe me not specifying that there are two obvious and strangely to me such different groups, is my failure.
            My son, who is half Hispanic gets a pass with the ganstas he had to live with for a year or so because he stomped someone that tried to hurt him with such severity, he got a rep, and sure, fostercare is safe, and they feed their kids, uh no. That was what he had to go through because of the criminal ACS, Fostercare, and Catholic Charities created while I took my sons away from their incompetent and criminal mother, but they couldn’t dare allow a white man just get his sons back…just because he did no wrong, is no reason not to punish him. He must have in a past life done SOMEthing wrong.
            He’s been teaching me their perspective. He lives by their code, or at least understands theirs…
            I’m not talking about the black people I’ve worked with and relied on in FDNY EMS, virtually all of them, at least for the job we had to do, were exemplary. I’m talking about those that live only to destroy, even if it’s just the decorum of a quiet movie theater, a place of business, a campus, a work place or a community. I suggest you be more careful than you think you should be. Ignorance CAN get you killed. Not even ganstas do I disrespect, not just because I respect everyone UNTIL they lose that benefit (I was a NYC math teacher and that kept me alive I learned later…) but because of their choices, because THEY THINK. They are NOT what the media that lies to us say they are: homicidal maniacs. On the countrary, they gang up to protect themselves from the gov’t and its exploitation.
            Whoopsie, the gov’t are the criminals.

          • Also, how did Oprahs lawyers tell her what to say? She was doing an interview when she said it. Are you saying the whole interview was coached by lawyers? You are really sick and irrational. Oprah didn’t say kill whites. She said OLD racist whites need to die out to solve the problem. Why target OLD whites if you want an end to the white race?

          • Non-sequitor.
            It’s irrelevant that she said “only” old white people must die. I will be “old” someday, so why wait?

          • You just want to debate. Or argue. You keep changing your claims about Oprah when you fail to prove your point.
            1st- You practically screamed that Oprah out out a death threat on WHITE PEOPLE. I pointed out that you could listen to or read what she actually said and that an interviewer asked her about old style RACISM and when it would end. She responded that the old whites who practiced it would have to die (off). I pointed you to the obvious, that Oprah was suggesting that WHITES of her generation and YOUNGER would live on with less racism in their lives. Hardly a death threat at WHITES to let Whites in the prime of their lives…..live! And kill the old cronies.
            2nd- You claimed Oprahs lawyers coached her to make her racist death threat…. safer! Huh? It was an interview! The reporter asked her about racism
            3rd- Now you say Oprah is racist because she thinks only OLD whites can be racist? That’s the issue? I thought you said Oprah put a bounty on the White races head? Now she’s just racist for saying very OLD whites hold the last vestiges of OLD racism?
            (Like I said, you are preoccupied with setting BLACK WOMEN up as violent threats. I’ve seen your type before. You have lots of issues, but race **featuring black male violence*** and gender*** featuring white female selfishness and privilege*** is your biggest peeve! Oddly, men like you feel better COMBINING your race/gender anger using BLACK WOMEN. It’s a cheap and , in many ways, cowardly trick. That does nothing to stop black males and white females from running over you)

          • To me, the second men silence white women, but just stopping to listen, they are defeated. Kinda in the vein of MGTOW.
            With the “loud” class black women, there still is a potential physical threat. They are used to fighting, because they’re used to being attacked. I get that, I just need, or desire to waste even a moment of time or effort on anyone I would never care to interact with, but I can’t do that. Walking the street makes you a potential target.
            The knock out game victim, sure looks at the knockout game way differently than the participate, just like the EU rape victims look at the raping game different than a bonding experience with father and son, or cousin, going out and playing.
            That’s out perspective difference.

        • 3) Abortion? Once again, you are using black females to vent. First, abortion didn’t make black males violent. Stop putting your Men’s movement Be on them. Jamaica, Haiti, most of black Africa, Brazil, Guyana… Around the world, black males SAVAGE Black women and girls in ways that so closely mirror the sexual violence brutality of Chicago or Baltimore that it’s unnerving. The fact is, there is no place on Earth with large numbers of blacks in it that does not have high levels of violence, and/ or crime, and/ or rape. “Safe”, sleepy Carib islands and remote African tribes have casual violence and rampant rape. Places where there’s NO ABORTION, welfare, feminism (Caribbean, Africa) have FAR higher rates of black men demeaning and abusing Black women and children.
          That racist black ABORTION campaign you referenced was based on clinics on the New York area………A place with long standing ghetto poverty and violence. A study of one inner city location or even 2,3,……5 in similar areas does NOT PROVE THAT ABORTION EQUALS VIOLENCE! It’s indicate s that Black male violence is leading black FEMALES to opt out of bringing kids into the world and if abortion is available- they will do it. Odd, since so many like you say black women want kids for WELFARE money. But why would these women flush the Food Stamps and free Apartment down the drain so much that the abortions outnumber births (and welfare checks that come with it, right?)
          Also odd, is that you said black women are aborting SONS! Really? How do you figure that? Shouldn’t these VIOLENT BLACK women who want to kill YOU- be pissed at mom for aborting DAUGHTERS and, therefore, running thru the streets like black males do? They aren’t, you know. If Black females were, there wouldn’t be a Black community or neighboring white ones.
          **W.E.B DUBUOIS said 100 YEARS ago that Black violence was the #1 problem, over riding white lynching. He added that he’d witnessed black women FEROCIOUSLY beaten by black men.
          *) You white men refuse to attack white women for their bad behavior. They ABORT babies when couples are waiting YEARS to adopt white or even biracial infants and would pay White women thousand$$$ for their babies.
          White women have routinely FALSELY accuse men and college boys of ALL RACES of sexual assualt…..Rarely get into trouble. Cosby, Kobe, Fox news…… Predatory women? No. Black women aren’t doing that and wouldn’t be allowed to get away with it.
          White women are cashing in at divorce……But Black women who divorce overwhelmingly end up in poverty even though she works outside the home and earns more money than black men. Why? Because black men dump their kids, but resent child support. The result is a black, divorced woman struggling on one salary! THINK. Blacks have higher divorce rates than all other groups. So shouldn’t there be a shit load of black women sitting pretty with HALF HIS MONEY? It’s white women cashing in.

          • Wow, you’d think, since I wrote it down, you’d have the time to understand my statement.
            A biased eye biases all.
            I never implied black women are bad in any way. Black people prior to FDR’s Great Society had more intact nuclear families as a percentage than white people did. FDR wanted all black ppl to leave the Republican party, which black ppl were uniformly: Republicans, to democrats “for the next hundred years.” He did so by paying them off, turning cities into urban plantations, and now blacks are democrats and have no collective memory of which party fought for them to be free or give them the right to vote.
            White women (sic) had benefited from the affirmative action laws meant for minorities almost exclusively for decades, now, karma is a bitch, and they are getting fired and replaced by actual minorities (now the majority in the US, but who’s counting), since the white men have been targeted and fired first and thrown away. I think that’s funny.
            Yes, white women have been the victors in the Western Gynocracies, but no more. Don’t worry be happy. I am. They are joining the long term unemployed en masse.
            Is it the color of my cat avatar? I could change it to a black cat. I’m really good with photoshop and cats.

          • Once again, your facts are incorrect. Blacks did not have more intact. nuclear families than whites did. In fact, blacks always had higher rates of divorce. The famous Moynihan Report ( which started the “blame welfare ” lie) even admits that 40 percent of married black couples in 1955-60 did NOT report “spouse present” – meaning these homes were only 2 parent on PAPER. One spouse- most often the black husband- was long gone . Dr. Ben Carson’s childhood is classic example.
            Jewish and Italian couples had only 20percent record of spouses not being present.

          • Once again your sophistry in lieu of logic is easy disproven.
            I said Great Society of FDR. You know the one he said would turn blacks from Republicans (those republicans that freed them and gave them the right to vote and even CIVIL Rights over the objections of the KKK democrats) to democrats for the next 100 years, by creating urban plantations…he DID get that done.
            “Post-Civil War studies revealed that most black couples in their forties had been together for at least twenty years. In southern urban areas around 1880, nearly three-fourths of black households were husband- or father-present; in southern rural settings, the figure approached 86%. As of 1940, the illegitimacy rate among blacks nationwide was approximately 15%—scarcely one-fifth of the current figure. As late as 1950, black women were more likely to be married than white women, and only 9% of black families with children were headed by a single parent.” [This was from the Census (https://www.census.gov/hhes/socdemo/marriage/data/acs/ElliottetalPAA2012paper.pdf) but magically it’s been moved I’ll find it again…]
            Furthermore, EVEN in your mistimed frame…
            “In 1964, Republicans – led by Sen. Everett Dirksen, R-Ill. – were responsible for the Civil Rights Act, which overturned 80 years of Democratic opposition to ending race-based and gender-based inequality.
            “When Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act, 82 percent of blacks lived in married, two-parent households; 40 percent of blacks were small-business owners.”
            –MYCHAL MASSIE
            It’s ok to live in your on self created fantasy, just don’t expect anyone else that can think rationally to follow you down a hole.

          • You didn’t disprove my “sophistry”. You just got unnecessarily wordy and told
            me that you hadn’t even checked my source- yet to see if I’m wrong!
            Then you added nonsense talk like- “Whatever anyone reports is unreliable….” but what I posted might be TRUE….. but it’s contradicted by the census! Huh?!
            **Nothing is true. But if it’s true. It can be contradicted….but YOU offer your info…..AS THE TRUTH.**
            You’re talking in circles again. And just repeating your same ideas.
            As I said, blacks were NOT more likely to be married than Whites. You need to take a closer look at your info, the years referenced. Black Story book marriage (as you are creating it over white marriage rates) didn’t…..and couldn’t…..have bottomed out that quickly to create the mid 1963 out of wedlock rate. THINK! That is a span of only 13 years. So who’s having these bastard kids? The blsck married couples from the Good Ole Days of 1950? Their kids? It’s only 13-15 yrs difference. It would be odd for a wave of black kids from Black two parent homes to go rogue because FDR offered them welfare and Civil Rights?
            Dude, Whites were offered the same welfare and white women got more civil rights freedoms- yet white families held on for decades longer.
            Like I said, blacks DIDN’T have more marriages than whites, ESPECIALLY when you consider that black illegitimacy was always over 4X higher than whites! More marriage AND more illegitimacy? Again, most black two parent homes did NOT have 2 parents in them. “SPOUSE PRESENT” was an important indicator of the REAL status of the family. BLACK husbands were not there usually. I know. My father left when I was 5 , but they didn’t divorce until I was 17 and he remarried. We got nothing…..like Dr. Ben Carson. I grew up in a single parent MARRIED home with my mother as sole support. My grandmother raised 8 kids in the 1940- late 50s – first in a rural shack with newspaper stuffed between the logs walls or you could see outside! Her husband went off to find work and…..like so many black men- didn’t come back. He just started another family out of wedlock! She worked taking care of rich white people’s kids while she lived in a shitty housing project that was heaven compared to that cabin. She had to prove that her husband hadn’t been with them for years or she wouldn’t have qualified for help. When he youngest son died after eating lead paint chips in the run down OLD cabin, they took pity on her and her living conditions.
            There’s a shopping center where her cabin used to be. Who knows who even owned the land. Her typical, deadbeat black husband ran the show…..then ran off! She left that place to find work and indoor plumbing!
            THAT IS THE REALITY OF BLACK MARRIAGE before 1960!

      • As my son is teaching me about gansta culture, I can confirm, they not only use sex as a means of “defiling” black women, but their “snow bunnies” too.
        As the white women are thinking they are doing something edgy, the black men behind them are thinking amazing thoughts, and they ain’t good.
        Since all black men or men for that matter were brought up by their mothers…except for as stated elsewhere, when the state guns down one or both parents as children, I hold them accountable for the extraordinary misogyny, or is it just reality? MGTOW, my son explained, is white guys coming to the finish line second to the black man. They already have their black women in a lock, by presenting what their “predators” are looking for as a tactical feign to get what they want.
        He said, even kids in foster care collect women like candy, and care less about them. I still haven’t had explained to me, why they even interact with them at all if they value them so little. I assume for the biological imperative, but I have yet to verify that.
        My son told me, to his friends, sex is for the WOMEN, not them, so they are at the advantage, I still don’t understand it…maybe in the black community as the black pastors have said, their is such a high rate of homosexuality that maybe black women have few choices?

        • How can your son teach you about gangsta culture? Is he black or a former gang member? Gangsta culture is not new. Black boxer Jack Johnson brutalized his light skinned black wife until she killed herself, claimed he would never date black women, then brutally beat and cheated on his white girlfriend…..100 years ago!!!
          Gangsta culture is machismo in Latin country and Warlord tactics in Africa. It’s Frat Boy- Jock culture for White boys with money. What makes black males different from all the other races of men is that they never stop. They have no point where they say”We’re doing too much damage. It’s sick. Their too young to do that to!”
          But that’s not the fault of black mothers. No one raised black males this way in Africa or America or Haiti or….. anymore than Muslim women raised men who would behead her for trying to get an education or showed her ankles.
          You are creating a Catch 22 where if boys grow up to be stable and successful, it’s due to 2 parent homes. But if they become monsters, it’s the mothers fault even if there was a dad there.

    • Black men post racial slurs and death threats at “Black women” – the group – on Facebook routinely.
      A black man who killed black coed Asia McGowan- posted racial slurs calling black women “whores” on his Facebook and on YouTube channels where black men devote hours to hating black women and saying black women helped white men enslave blacks on the plantation.
      It takes years to get these hate sites removed and these men are never banned. Tommy Sotomayor threatens to kill black women routinely – his channels are deemed NOT offensive.
      ( No. It’s not just whites as victims )

  1. Twitter, Facebook, Google and Instagram are all done. It is only a matter of time. We are slowly learning that we don’t like fake shite. And we don’t like them…. excepting, of course, the mentally challenged and febrile…. for whom we feel only pity.

  2. Who are the Nazi book burners? “Social Media” is the Nazi Book Burners, suppressing Free Speech and thought sharing.
    FACEBOOK, TWITTER, YOUTUBE, REDDIT, GOOGLE are PLACES OF PUBLIC GATHERING, “SOCIAL Media”, and ADVERTISE themselves as PUBLIC places.. They are also PUBLICLY TRADED CORPORATIONS, unlike the PRIVATELY owned and operated “Mom&Pop” Bakery and Party Planner SUED by homosexuals.
    FACEBOOK is a PUBLIC SPACE therefore it has no right or legal option to censor participants. FACEBOOK is a PUBLICLY TRADED company, NOT a “private entity” and it solicits PUBLIC memberships.
    Just as cake bakers HAVE to bake homosexual cakes, and wedding planners HAVE to “accept” homosexual weddings, SUCKERberg has to accept opinions, videos, and pictures he does not like. These Social Media/Meeting Places must accept anything which is Permissible under the First Amendment.
    The same applies to ALL “social media”, YOUTUBE, and search engines.
    A lowly COUNTY CLERK was jailed for refusing to “do her duty” by not issuing homosexuals marriage licenses The Baker, Planner, and Clerk SHOULD have just said: “You homosexuals VIOLATE OUR COMMUNITY GUIDLINES” !!! They advertise themselves as “Social Media & Public Spaces” so everything that is covered under the First Amendment can be posted there. A Party Planner and a Baker were successfully sued for refusing service to homosexuals ….. these “Social Media” can & should also be sued for violating People’s 1st Amendment RIGHTS to speak freely in PUBLIC SPACES.
    Facebook, Youtube, Twitter, etc. engaging in politically motivated censorship is like your meter reader shutting off your electricity because you have a Trump sign on your lawn. These social media have become like public utilities and therefore have no right to engage in political censorship.

  3. SUCKerberg wants to censor who uses FACEBOOK —- but WE should not censor who comes into Our house?! Take the locks off his doors. Take those WALLS down from around SUCKerberg’s houses. NEVER allow him to file a “breaking & entering” complaint because SUCKerberg wants anyone to be able to “break & enter” America.
    By the way ….. SUCK thinks he can just “share” our house/Nation …..he never served in uniform so he should “share” all his money with those who were wounded saving HIS FREEDOM and PROPERTY. Since SUCK does not recognize Our property rights to Our country then he has no property rights to his money.

  4. OH, that post was DOEMSTIC TERRORISM and should have been reported to Department of Homeland Security.
    That poster just may ACT on her post.

  5. This is a bs story. There are several channels devoted to racist attacks on BLACK WOMEN. Most of them made by black men in child support disputes or with domestic violence histories.
    Comments like when 2 black men( one called Cadillac Khadafi aka BlacKing 4 White Queen) posted that they lover it when police shoot black women. Cadillac called it “Getting Renisha McBride d “- referencing black woman shot by a white man thru a closed door after she had a car accident.
    Tommy Sotomayor posted that he hoped black woman and girls would all be gassed Nazi style. Tommy hosts sites where white and Hispanic men joke about raping and killing black women. Most of the posts areally reviewed and allowed initially.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.