When everyone at the Fed sees no slowdown, pay attention!

by

Lumber Goes Timber As Housing Demand Buckles

Lumber has fallen to roughly $550 per thousand board feet, its lowest close of 2026 and about 16% below its late July peak near $655.

That decline matters because it is happening despite a supply environment that should normally support higher prices.

Canadian lumber still faces substantial US duties and tariffs. Those trade barriers raise import costs and reduce the incentive for Canadian mills to send marginal supply into the United States.

Yet lumber keeps falling.

That makes the current move look increasingly like a demand story overwhelming a constrained supply structure.

Demand Is Winning The Tug Of War

Housing remains deeply rate sensitive.

Single family construction remains below last year’s pace, mortgage rates are restrictive, permits are weak and builders continue citing affordability and financing costs as major obstacles.

Lumber sits directly in the middle of that transmission.

When builders become less confident about future demand, they reduce speculative construction and carry less inventory. Distributors respond by purchasing closer to immediate need rather than building large stockpiles.

Consumers behave similarly.

Large remodeling projects, additions, decks and other discretionary construction can be delayed much more easily than basic maintenance.

That removes both physical demand and inventory demand from the lumber market.

The tariffs actually make the price decline more revealing.

If housing demand were genuinely accelerating, expensive Canadian supply should amplify upward price pressure.

Instead, weak demand is absorbing that cost shock.

Tariffs may therefore be providing a floor beneath lumber rather than determining its current direction.

Home Depot And Lowe’s Are Seeing The Same Thing

The major home improvement retailers are describing a similar consumer.

Home Depot continues to see resilience in professional contractor demand, but households remain cautious around larger discretionary projects.

Lowe’s has also reported stronger professional and services activity while discretionary do it yourself spending remains soft.

That distinction matters.

Consumers are still fixing the roof when it leaks or replacing something that breaks.

They are much less willing to commit to the expensive addition, remodel or outdoor project that consumes large quantities of lumber and produces a much larger retail ticket.

Lower lumber prices can also pressure retailer revenue because the same physical volume of wood generates fewer sales dollars.

What The Price Signal Is Saying

Lumber does not have to collapse for the message to matter.

The important point is that it is reaching yearly lows while import costs remain elevated and Canadian supply is constrained.

That suggests the marginal buyer is disappearing faster than supply is adjusting.

Eventually mills can cut production enough to stabilize prices.

But that would not automatically mean housing demand recovered.

The real confirmation would come from mortgage applications, permits, builder orders and large project spending improving together.

Until then, lumber looks like another warning from the rate sensitive economy.

High financing costs are not eliminating the need for homes or remodeling.

They are suppressing the ability and willingness to pay for them.

And when prices fall despite tariffs and constrained supply, that is usually telling you something important about demand.

Remember what I said – on Wednesday?

And now we begin to see the reason why….

Bond Yields TOP – as Fund Managers begin to reallocate into more conservative positions. Buying Bonds.

Why?

Because it is obvious to anybody who has spent 10 days studying the economy and the market, that the Rate Hike killed the last breath of the Economy.

Now…. declining yields will give us the full picture and confirmation.

BUT…. by mainstream media and “economists” it will be seen as a success. That Warsh fought off the Bond vigilantes.

That will be the uninformed chitchat….!

The real story is – that the Camel’s Back is broken.

Warsh: Too Many Red Flags

Kevin Warsh has failed the test, and investors should pay attention now that he is Fed chairman.

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

His Jackson Hole performance, the Fed’s subsequent rate hike and yesterday’s Q&A are not isolated slips. They point to one conclusion: Warsh will not change the Federal Reserve’s reaction function. He will respond Pavlovianly to inflation headlines, prediction-market pricing and superficial strength in aggregate data.

At Jackson Hole, Warsh adopted the posture of the inflation fighter. The subsequent rate hike made the message operational, despite an economy split between a narrow group of cash-rich growth sectors and interest-sensitive industries that remain under sustained pressure.

Yesterday’s Q&A revealed the framework beneath that decision. Asked what had changed in his economic view, Warsh cited the Iran war and the AI capital-expenditure boom. His suggestion that AI capex itself is an inflation concern was the most revealing part.

AI spending on data centres, power generation, grids, semiconductors and networking is not another consumer-demand binge. It is productive capital formation. It may cause temporary bottlenecks in electricity, equipment and skilled labour, but its purpose is to expand supply, raise output per worker and lower unit costs. Warsh appears to see rising capex and reach reflexively for the old diagnosis: demand is excessive, policy must restrain it. He does not distinguish sufficiently between spending that consumes capacity and investment that creates it. That is a category error.

His treatment of the Iran-war oil shock is worse. Warsh did not acknowledge that an oil supply shock is a tax on growth. It may raise headline prices, but it also reduces household purchasing power, squeezes corporate margins and weakens demand. The Fed cannot create oil supply, secure shipping routes or end a war with higher interest rates. Hiking into this shock risks turning a temporary price-level increase into recession.

Yes, Warsh ignored basic theory and hiked into an oil price shock.

Yes, Warsh believes in the shadows in Plato’s cave that we still live in the 1970s.

Warsh actual views directly conflicts with Trump’s Hamiltonian strategy, which depends on directing private capital into energy abundance, advanced computing, domestic manufacturing, supply-chain resilience and defence capacity.

Its purpose is to expand America’s productive base and support growth through a heavy debt burden, not to inflate consumption. A Fed chair who treats the AI buildout as inflationary while missing an oil shock’s damage to growth becomes an internal opponent of that strategy.

Warsh has shown no evidence that he will challenge the Fed’s stale reaction function. He appears captive to it, following prediction markets and headline inflation rather than applying independent judgment. His Jackson Hole warning about a “hall of mirrors” now rings hollow. Warsh appears trapped inside it, confusing market theatre with monetary analysis and performance with leadership.

There is a phrase for this: big hat, no cattle. Investors should not ignore the red flags. The evidence points to the same failed reaction function, another hike in October and a Fed chairman who sounds less like an independent steward of monetary policy than a game-show host performing decisiveness for the cameras.

 

Got a news tip or correction? Let us know

If you got something out of this, please chip in to keep this site running, or subscribe to go ad-free.

0 views