Why Recession Is Closer Than You Think

Sharing is Caring!

via valuewalk:

Well-known surveys from firms like Bank of America Merrill Lynch suggest most investors don’t expect a recession until next year at least, but Stanley Druckenmiller warned in a recent interview that some less-obvious warning signs are starting to appear. He also noted that the Federal Reserve seems to be so focused on deflation, which he calls “the boogeyman,” that officials are missing out on other signals.

In an onstage interview for the Economic Club of New York, Druckenmiller was asked about an editorial he wrote last year about interest rates in which he said the Fed would be making a policy error if it raised rates at that time. He had been urging the central bank to raise rates for the three or four years before that.

He emphasized in this week’s interview that the keywords in his editorial were “for now” because he felt like December was the wrong time to raise rates, even though he thought rates were lower than they should’ve been by that time. He also said that often the Fed creates a deflationary bust through the very actions it took to try to avoid one.

When asked if he would raise rates, he said he would “sneak one in every time financial conditions allowed and hopefully by some point rates will be high enough that we’ll have an appropriate rate for investment where people won’t be doing stupid things like they have in past asset bubbles.”

Where are the signals?

Druckenmiller also spoke about the credit crisis, expressing concern that corporate debt has ballooned faster than corporate profits and interest costs. He pegged corporate debt at $6 trillion in 2010 and $10 trillion now, while corporate profits grew from $1.7 trillion to $2.2 trillion cumulatively over eight years on a $4 trillion increase in debt. Additionally, he notes that while debt increased 65%, interest costs only went up 23%. He described this situation as “horrendous productivity of capital.”

He also noted that increase in financial engineering with $5.7 trillion in buybacks versus $2.2 trillion in capital expenditures. He said in 2010, buybacks were 20% of capital expenditures, but they’re now 55% with a “much higher stock market.” He also emphasized that it isn’t the companies that are innovating that are borrowing. It’s old, dying retail companies that are borrowing.

“Here we are in probably the most innovative I would say economic disruptive period since the late 1800s and you hardly see any bankruptcies,” he said. “Because there have been no market signals from the Fed — this is pre the last year… — but there’s one other problem with all this. That’s our government. Our government responds to market signals too, and the clowns in Washington, unless they get a signal from the bond market, they’re just going to keep spending. So for the first time in history, we have massive deficits and full employment… God help us if we get in a recession,” he added.



Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.