by Ruby Henley
President Trump knows what he is doing, and I feel confident of this. During President Trump’s press conference he pointed out border security is part of our national DEFENSE. He just got that money by signing the Omnibus Bill.
President Trump just tweeted the following:
Because of the $700 & $716 Billion Dollars gotten to rebuild our Military, many jobs are created and our Military is again rich. Building a great Border Wall, with drugs (poison) and enemy combatants pouring into our Country, is all about National Defense. Build WALL through M!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 25, 2018
“Because of the $700 & $716 Billion Dollars gotten to rebuild our Military, many jobs are created and our Military is again rich. Building a great Border Wall, with drugs (poison) and enemy combatants pouring into our Country, is all about National Defense. Build WALL through M!”
He is going to take money from the defense budget and have the military build the wall!
The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2018 (aka HR 1625) funds the federal government through September 30, 2018.
“The reaction among Trump’s base to his signing of the “budget deal” was outrage and talk of revolt.” InfoWars
On the same day that he signed the “budget deal,” President Trump also sent a letter to the leaders of the House and the Senate (WhiteHouse.gov):
Text of a Letter from the President to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President of the Senate –
Issued on: March 23, 2018 –
“Dear Mr. Speaker: (Dear Mr. President:)
In accordance with section 7058(d) of division K of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018 (H.R. 1625; the “Act”), I hereby designate as an emergency requirement all funding so designated by the Congress in the Act pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(A) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, for the accounts referenced in section 7058(d).
The details of this action are set forth in the enclosed memorandum from the Director of the Office of Management and Budget.
DONALD J. TRUMP”
So what is really going on here?
Congress is designated by the U.S. Constitution as having “power of the purse,” however, Congress has failed in exercising that power by not passing a federal budget bill for FY 2018. It is precisely because they have failed to pass an annual budget that led to Congress passing a series of appropriations bills, like the Consolidate Appropriations Act of 2018. Federal agencies cannot spend money unless funds are authorized and appropriated!
What is President Trump’s constitutional role in all this?
According to the National Priorities Project, “The Constitution does not specify. a role for the president in managing the nation’s finances“.
Is President Trump constitutionally obliged to obey Congress’ Omnibus Spending Bill? That is the question.
Appropriations bills, like the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2018, specify how much money will go to different government agencies and programs. There are two types of spending:
1)Mandatory spending that the federal government must by law pay out, such as Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. Being mandatory, this spending is authorized by Congress; it is not subject to appropriations.
2)Discretionary spending is the part of the U.S. federal budget that Congress appropriates each year to fund spending that are not Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid, which means all the other federal agencies, such as DOD, DHS, Education, Energy, HUD, NASA, and the State Department.
Both Congress and the President must abide by the mandatory spending. It is the discretionary spending part of the Omnibus Spending Bill that President Trump’s letter of March 23 addresses.
“In accordance with section 7058(d) of division K of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018 (H.R. 1625; the “Act”), I hereby designate as an emergency requirement all funding so designated by the Congress in the Act pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(A) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, for the accounts referenced in section 7058(d).
1) Section 7058(d) of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2018 refers to “Repurposed Funds“.
2) The Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, aka the Gramm-Rudman Act, was the first binding spending constraints on the federal budget, signed into law by President Ronald Reagan. The Act aimed to cut the federal budget deficit (which at the time, in dollar terms, was the largest in history) by providing for for automatic spending cuts (“sequestration”) to all departments and programs by an equal percentage, if the discretionary spending in Congress’ appropriation bills exceeds that year’s budget totals.
3) Section 251(b)(2)(A) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 says:
- b) ADJUSTMENTS TO DISCRETIONARY SPENDING LIMITS.—
2) SEQUESTRATION [automatic spending cuts] REPORTS.—When OMB submits a sequestration report under section 254(e), (f), or (g) for a fiscal year, OMB shall calculate, and the sequestration report and subsequent budgets submitted by the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, shall include adjustments to discretionary spending limits (and those limits as adjusted) for the fiscal year and each succeeding year, as follows:
- A) EMERGENCY APPROPRIATIONS; OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS/GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM.
President Trump is basically saying he intends to “repurpose” certain funds that Congress had appropriated as “discretionary spending,” towards “emergency appropriations, overseas contingency operations/global war on terrorism”.
In his speech to the nation on March 23, announcing that he has signed the Omnibus Spending Bill, President Trump called the funding of the border wall and illegal migrants — and by extension, sanctuary cities and states — a matter of “national security“.
His March 23 letter to Congress suggests he intends to “repurpose” or use the discretionary funds appropriated in the Omnibus Spending Bill to construct the border wall and combat illegal immigration, including sanctuary cities.
Let’s go back to the Obama years.
Fox News reported on July 21, 2009:
“President Obama has irked close allies in Congress by declaring he has the right to ignore legislation on constitutional grounds after having criticized George W. Bush for doing the same.
Four senior House Democrats on Tuesday said they were “surprised” and “chagrined” by Obama’s declaration in June that he doesn’t have to comply with provisions in a war spending bill that puts conditions on aid provided to the World Bank and International Monetary Fund.
In a signing statement accompanying the $106 billion bill, Obama said he wouldn’t allow the legislation to interfere with his authority as president to conduct foreign policy and negotiate with other governments.
Earlier in his six-month-old administration, Obama issued a similar statement regarding provisions in a $410 billion omnibus spending bill.”
“During the previous administration, all of us were critical of (Bush’s) assertion that he could pick and choose which aspects of congressional statutes he was required to enforce,” the Democrats wrote in their letter to Obama. “We were therefore chagrined to see you appear to express a similar attitude.”
Politico reported in August 2017:
“Lawmakers and activists are preparing for the possibility that President Donald Trump’s administration, in its zeal to slash the federal budget, will take the rare step of deliberately not spending all the money Congress gives it — a move sure to trigger legal and political battles.”
Does Trump have something up his sleeve. Is this the truth or false hope? You be the judge.