by Chris Black
This is hardly news, or at least it should not be for the informed reader. We all know that the European Union, a colossus with feet of clay (read Euro) has absolutely no strategy to deal with the consequences of its immigration policy some call suicidal. However, what’s actually very interesting is the fact that the president of the European Union Parliament now admits it frankly.
I am talking about Antonio Tajani, the “boss” of the EU Parliament, who said:
“Europe remains unprepared for a massive surge in immigration from Africa; overcrowding, poverty and war and will likely push ‘millions’ of people from Africa to Europe in the coming decades; without a strategy we will have terrorism, illegal immigration, instability.”
Excuse me, but the EU does not “have” to take in all these African migrants—that’s a choice the people should be making, not the ivory tower leaders immune to its effects. This guy actually called for a “Marshall Plan” for Africa in order to mitigate the flow of migrants. Basically, he asks for more welfare for Africans paid by the European taxpayer. Yet another government program which redistributes wealth, what can go wrong?
In laymen’s terms, this means that the immense bureaucracy which is the European Union is ruled by inept leaders who only care about the next election cycle, as they have a short-term type of thinking and no contingent plans/no strategy beyond that. And given yet another wave of unvetted migrants from Africa and the Middle East, those EU countries which incidentally are welfare havens, will be confronted with various problems, including increased crime, poverty, jihad attacks, expanding no-go zones, a worsening housing crisis and so forth and so on.
The flow of migrants from Africa or wherever can easily be curtailed by avoiding welfare payments to them. The navy and army can be deployed at the borders by overriding international legal restrictions. However, the EU elite are more than happy to take in more immigrants as they are used as pawns to erase the identity of individual member states. This is carried out in order to realize a United States of Europe regardless of the wishes of the original citizens of each respective member state.
Let’s suppose you lived in a community that once was based on hunting and natural food gathering. As such, like the Hawaiians who were forced to control the population before the arrival of the “civilized” world, you would be keenly aware of the effects of too much reproduction.
As Africa was dragged into the modern age, the shortfall in food availability was erased by well-meaning NGOs who came to give aid in each crisis. Yet, little opportunity for advancement, the mainspring of incentive, came with it. Effectively, the poorest of Africa had little incentive beyond existing and reproducing on a subsidy. Any real gains were absorbed by corruption.
Islam is a large part of that problem because it has no WASP ethic that promotes personal achievement; concentrating on using up lives in simple daily living for a promised future Janna with a large portion of the day devoted to worship.
If one provides fertilizer to plants, growth is expected. When NGOs continuously provide food and shelter beyond a society’s natural ability to provide for itself, exponential growth should be expected.
“Mother Merkel” has provided what Islam and the NGOs did not – incentive to migrate with an assured subsidy in the new land. The population explosion will continue as long as there are subsidies and violence will ensue if they are withdrawn.
by Chris Black